Sea Search Armada, a US-based salvage company, claims the Republic of Colombia owes it $4 billion to $17 billion for breaching a contract granting it the right to salvage the galleon San Jose, sunk by the British Navy on June 8, 1708.
The Spanish galleon San Jose was trying to outrun a fleet of British warships off Colombia on June 8, 1708, when a mysterious explosion sent it to the bottom of the sea with gold, silver and emeralds owned by private Peruvian and European merchants, and lies about 700 feet below the water’s surface, a few miles from the historic Caribbean port of Cartagena, on the edge of the Continental Shelf.
Jack Harbeston, managing director of the Cayman Islands-registered commercial salvage company Sea Search Armada, who has taken on seven Colombian administrations during two decades in a legal fight to claim half the sunken hulk’s riches.
“If I had known it was going to take this long, I wouldn’t have gotten involved in the first place,” said Harbeston, 75, who lives in Bellevue, Wash.
The 41-page federal lawsuit outlines a long, tortuous journey through the Colombian courts after the Glocca Morra Co. identified six shipwreck locations, between 1980 and 1985, operating with the permission of Colombia’s Direccion General Maritima.
Harbeston claims he and a group of 100 U.S. investors – among them the late actor Michael Landon and the late convicted Nixon White House adviser John Ehrlichman – invested more than $12 million since a deal was signed with Colombia in 1979 giving Sea Search exclusive rights to search for San Jose and 50 percent of whatever they find.
Colombia tried to weasel out of the deal after Sea Search recovered materials from the ship, proving it was down there. Colombia “delayed signing the written agreement it had drafted, and eventually refused to sign the offer it had made to SSA,” the complaint states. But nonetheless Colombia refused to let it salvage the shipwreck.
All that changed in 1984, when then-Colombian President Belisario Betancur signed a decree reducing Sea Search’s share from 50 percent to a five percent “finder’s fee.”
Sea Search sued in Colombia, calling the Seizure Law retroactive and unconstitutional, and the Colombian Supreme Court agreed in 1994, giving Sea Search rights to 50 percent of the San Jose treasure, and the other half to Colombia, according to the complaint.
Sea Search says Colombia still refuses to let it salvage the shipwreck, and has taken a series of actions in bad faith, for decades, to prevent it from doing so. It demands $4 bill to $17 billion – the estimated value of the treasure – and damages for breach of contract and conversion, and enforcement of the foreign judgment.
The real value is impossible to calculate because the ship’s manifests have disappeared. San Jose is known to have been part of Spain’s only royal convoy to try to bring colonial bullion home to King Philip V during the War of Spanish Succession with England from 1701 to 1714.
“Without a doubt, the San Jose is the Holy Grail of treasure shipwrecks,” said Robert Cembrola, director of the Naval War College Museum in Newport, Rhode Island.
Press Release: Sea Search Armada v. Republic of Colombia, and Intervenor Isidoro Rodriguez v. Sea Search Armada, D.C. 10-cv-02083 (JEB)
The above intervener action was filed on April 15, 2011, to protect and enforce a Virginia Attorney’s Lien on Sea Search Armada’s claim to treasure troves valued at $17 Billion sunk off the coast of the Republic of Colombia.
Related to the above, Irene Rodriguez et al v. Douglas Shulman and Sea Search Armada et al, Dist. Ct. DC #11-cv-01183(JEB)(June 28, 2011)(Web File: https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B5cyVqAGuKgrZTllYjIyYmItOThmMS00ZGVlLWI0MmItYzMyZGEwMWI4ZTZi&hl=en_US), was filed against an interstate criminal enterprise motivated by financial interest, cronyism, and/or animosity to the independence of Plaintiffs as attorneys by the oligarch of Sea Search Armada et al., their Beltway Lobbyists/Attorneys, government employees/attorneys and federal/Virginia judges’ willful acts outside the scope of their respective minister-ial/judicial authority and jurisdiction by oppression under color of law.
In summary, the oligarch’s interstate criminal conspiracy began in 2003 to punish Isidoro Rodriguez in retaliation for: (1) litigating on behalf of nonresident US/Colombian citizens (e.g., Martinez v. Lamagno and DEA, 515 U.S. 417 (1995); (2) litigating to protect a Virginia Attorney’s property rights; and, (3) petitioning Congress to investigate DOJ attorneys and judges’ obstruction of a father’s rights under Treaty, 18 U.S.C. § 1204, and a Joint Custody Agreement (see http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml). In 2006 the conspiracy was compound-ed to deprive Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez of their right to self-employment by willful acts of treason and misprision of the felony of treason in violation of Art. IV § 4 of the U.S. Const., the Void Order Doctrine, Internal Revenue Code, the Racketeering Influenced and Corruption Organization Act (“R.I.C.O.”), Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and rule of law of separation of power under our constitutional system (see http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance, and http://home.earthlink.net/~treason).
Therefore this Press Release is a public service to trigger an investigation of the oligarch in Washington, D.C., depriving citizens of their rights to access to an impartial court and a trial by jury to protect their property and self-employment.
Isidoro Rodriguez Dra. Irene Rodriguez
Member Ct. of App for the Fed. Cir. Attorney in Rep.Colombia
THE LAW OFFICES OF ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
Northern Virginia Office: South American Office:
7924 Peyton Forest Trail World Trade Center
Annandale, Virginia 22003-1560 Calle 76 No. 54-11, Suite 313
Telephone/telefax: 571.423.5066 Barranquilla, Colombia
Mobil: 703.470.1457 E-mail: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]