PCGS Specials

HomeUS CoinsStruck Counterfeit Coins: Another Family of Struck Fake Large Cents

Struck Counterfeit Coins: Another Family of Struck Fake Large Cents

Struck Counterfeit Coins: Another Family of Struck Fake Large Cents

By Jack D. Young, Early American Coppers (EAC) ……
It has been a while since I wrote my CoinWeek article on the “family” of large cent counterfeits based on the 1833 N-5 variety, but I have since found the time to discuss another of the “family” type that I call the “beaded” border counterfeit based on the 1814 Classic Head S-295 variety.

As I noted previously, I consider this type of counterfeit an intermediate level of deceptive “type”. It can certainly fool collectors unfamiliar with the series.

These struck fakes are available in several different denominations and varieties and are fairly accurate as compared to the source coins. But the counterfeiters use the same layout and change the date to create a family of fakes, resulting in impossible die combinations/states. These take a higher level of knowledge to discern, with being savvy about the series and variety attributions part of the best defense.

The subject coin for this article is an 1812 Classic Head Large Cent a friend posted in a coin forum and sent to me for an in-hand review:

1812 Subject Example

As I have stated in my previous articles and my CoinWeek “Dark Corner” series, one should always start a coin review by ATTRIBUTING the subject example. For the 1812 there are four different documented varieties, but unfortunately, this isn’t one! Date position and spacing do not match any, though the S-290 is the closest.

Left: Subject 1812. Right: 1812 S-290 Example

But it does appear to closely match the 1814 S-295!

Left: Rev S-290. Cent: Subject 1812. Right: Rev S-295

Continued researching resulted in finding several other “dates” with the same “beaded border” obverse and the same reverse; the borders for the genuine coins are denticles, but shifting of the strike can make the more rounded tips to look like “beads” – as shown on all of these fakes.

Common 1814 S-295 Reverse

Comparing the “1814” from the group to a genuine 1814 S-295 shows how close this one is:

Left: Counterfeit 1814. Right: Genuine 1814 S-295

And the reverse:

Left: Counterfeit 1814. Right: Genuine 1814 S-295

One of the common “die markers” for these is the damage on the “N” of UNITED:

Two Counterfeits and “damaged N”

The genuine source coin must have been damaged there and passed that along to the rest of the “family”!

And on the obverse there are “die chips”, with a prominent one to the left of the nose:

Two Counterfeits and “chips”

As I have previously stated in other articles, one of the best ways to protect yourself from this type of fake for sale is to learn the series yourself. Buy the reference books, join a discussion group or club focused on your interests–such as Early American Coppers (EAC)–and ask other experienced members and friends. And review similar items on the internet: major auction house sales archives and NGC’s and PCGS’s variety pages are great online resources.

And a recent source of quick information on these and other struck counterfeits can be viewed on CoinWeek, where the entire series of research articles can be accessed.

The research and summary articles continue to be a collaborative effort, with many EAC members and “Dark Side” friends participating and contributing!

Best as always,


MORE Articles on Counterfeit Coins by Jack D. Young


Jack D. Young
Jack D. Young
An engineer by training, Jack D. Young is a researcher and author on the subject of the recent wave of deceptive struck counterfeits. He is the founder of the "Dark Side" Counterfeits and Fakes Facebook watch group, a participating member of Early American Coppers (EAC) since 2002, the Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC), C4, the NLG, the ANA, and the ANS. Jack has consulted on the subject of counterfeits and their effect on the Hobby with staffers of the United States Senate Finance Committee, a senior member of the U.S. Secret Service (both with the ACTF as an Expert Network volunteer), and agents of both CBP and the Department of the Treasury. His work has appeared in various club journals, including The Numismatist, and he was acknowledged for his research by Q. David Bowers in the latter's The Copper Coins of Vermont (2018). The ACTF awarded Jack Young the Alan Kreuzer Award in 2019 and the PNG presented him with the Sol Kaplan Award in 2022. He started collecting as a youth, filling a Lincoln penny board with his grandmother, and continues to collect low-grade early large cents by date and some varieties.

Related Articles


  1. It’s a shame that with everything going on in life you got to deal with people like this I do not understand there’s one thing for sure though you can’t buy your way into heaven!!!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Bullion Sharks Silver

AU Capital Management US gold Coins

Blanchard and Company Gold and Precious Metals